|
|
|
Orthopaedic Surgery |

|
|
|
|
|
The typical
Orthopaedic Surgeries performed at
SPS Apollo Hospital Orthopaedic Centres are :
|
-
Arthroscopic, Arthrotomy /
Endoscopic surgery of all amenable joints
-
Excision of bone or soft tissue
tumours (benign, e.g., osteochondroma, enchondroma, ganglion)
-
Osteotomy closed and osteotomy
open (excluding open osteotomy of major bones i.e., femur, tibia
pelvis, etc.,)
-
Synovectomy
-
Bone biopsy
-
Bone grafting non-union of
fractures and pseudarthroses
-
Osteotomies of long bones
-
Tendon repairs and
reconstructions
-
Open and closed fracture
reduction (excluding major procedures e.g., Pelvis, femur,
acetabulum, spine)
-
Fasciotomy and Fasciectomy
-
Bone graft
|
|
Lumbar Spine
|
|
|
|
Hip
|
-
Hip Joint Replacement Surgery
-
Hip Resurfacing
-
Bone graft, (including harvesting iliac crest bone)
-
Excision of tumour (minor, benign)
-
Arthroscopic surgery
|
|
Knee
|
-
Total Knee Replacement (TKR)
-
Repair of ligaments including ACL repair
-
Reconstruction of ligaments
-
Open reduction & fixation of fractures
-
Arthroscopic surgery, including meniscal surgery,
synovectomy
|
|
Wrist
|
-
Arthrotomy
-
Arthroscopic surgery
-
Reduction of fractures, open
-
Reduction of fractures, closed
-
Arthroplasty
-
Arthrodesis
-
Carpal tunnel release open or endoscopic
|
|
Hand
|
-
Palmar fasciotomy & fasciectomy
-
Repair of tendons: flexor, extensor
-
Arthroplasty
-
Tendon transplants
-
Internal fixation of fractures
-
Skin graft
-
Pollicization
-
Repair of syndactyly
-
Repair of digital nerves
-
Synovectomy
-
Tenodesis, tenolysis, and tendon transfers and grafts
-
Repair Boutonniere deformity
-
Arthroplasty finger, thumb, carpus and wrist
-
Neurolysis
-
Ganglion excision
|
|
Elbow
|
|
|
|
Shoulder
|
-
Open reduction of fracture
-
Arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery
-
Arthrotomy
-
Open reduction of fracture
-
Repair of rotator cuff
-
Repair of acromioclavicular separation
-
Repair of dislocations
-
Rotator cuff repair
-
Labral surgery
-
Surgical decompression
-
Extensor mechanism realignment
|
|
Hip Joint Replacement Surgery
|
-
Treatment of Hip Arthritis
-
Types of Hip Replacement and Methods of Fixation
-
Benefits, Risks and Potential Complications
-
Revision Hip Surgery
-
Alternatives to Hip Replacement
-
Special Studies
-
Planning for Your Surgery
-
The Operation
-
Postoperative Course
-
After You Go Home
-
Long-term Precautions and Advice
|
|
The Hip Resurfacing
The hip joint is commonly called a "ball and socket" joint. The
"ball" of the hip joint, the femoral head, rests within a "socket"
called the acetabulum (see figure left). The femoral head and
acetabulum are covered by a specialized surface, articular
cartilage, which allows smooth and painless motion of the joint.
With hip injury or disease, articular cartilage undergoes
degeneration and wears away. The joint surfaces become rough and
irregular resulting in pain and stiffness. This is commonly known
as "arthritis" but it has many causes. The onset of pain is
gradual and, initially, it occurs only after higher levels of
physical activity. Pain gradually increases and may become present
at rest as well. Physical disability includes a limp, muscle
spasm, and decreased range of motion with increasing stiffness.
|
|
Types of Hip Replacement and
Methods of Fixation
Selection of the optimal treatment plan should be consistent
with the degree of pain, the amount of hip disability, and the
non-surgical and surgical alternatives. The individual's
anticipated life span will also influence the selection of
treatment.
Total Hip Replacement is an operation designed to replace
the damaged hip joint. Various prosthetic designs and types of
procedures are available to the surgeon. Our surgeons carefully
evaluate the patient to: 1) determine if surgery is indicated; 2)
determine the most appropriate type of procedure; and 3) develop a
plan of treatment. The types of replacement, methods of fixation
and new alternate bearing materials are discussed below.
|
-
Stem Type with Acrylic Cement Fixation
-
Stem Type without Cement Fixation
-
Stem Type with Hybrid Fixation
-
Bearing Materials Used in Joint Replacement
-
Metal-on-Metal Bearings
-
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings
-
Hemi-Surface Replacement for Osteonecrosis
|
|
Total Hip Replacement - Stem Type with Acrylic
Cement Fixation
In 1962, Sir John Charnley used a small (22 mm) stainless steel
ball on a stem which was inserted into the bone to replace the
femoral (ball) side of the joint and a high density plastic
socket to replace the acetabular (socket) side. Both of these
components were secured to bone with a self-curing acrylic
polymer commonly referred to as bone cement. Several generations
of designs have evolved from this original Charnley prosthesis.
The ball is now modular thereby allowing balls of different
sizes, materials and neck lengths to be placed onto the stem.
Most balls are now made of either a cobalt chrome metal alloy or
a ceramic material (Figures 2a and 2b). Results include
consistent pain relief due to immediate fixation and rapid
recovery with early weight bearing. It has been the general
experience, however, that the long term results of cemented
total hip replacements in young, active and/or heavy patients
are not as consistently durable as desired. The loosening rate
of cemented acetabular components increases with time leading to
many failures after 10 or 15 years. For these reasons,
cementless fixation has been advocated by some for younger or
more active patients.
|
|
Total Hip Replacement - Stem
Type without Cement Fixation
We are now in an era with widespread use of devices which are
designed to attach to bone without the use of cement. Bone will
attach to a metal implant if the surface of the metal has a
certain "topography". This process is called porous ingrowth or
osseointegration. The bone must be prepared precisely for these
devices because close apposition to bone is necessary for bone
to grow up to the smooth surface (osteointegration) or into the
pores of the porous surfaces (porous ingrowth). In general,
these devices are larger and longer than those used with cement
but are proportional to the size of the individual bone. Surface
coatings, such as hydroxyapatite, are also being utilized in an
effort to hasten and/or enhance bone fixation. An example of
this type of device is shown in Figures 3a and 3b.
Fig 3a Fig 3b Many different devices using cementless fixation
have been utilized since their introduction in the U.S. in 1977.
It is hoped that these devices will maintain their attachment to
bone longer, but some caution is advised in their application.
Complete pain relief after surgery is not as predictable as with
cemented stems. This is related to the type of cementless hip
prosthesis and the patient's anatomy, although most improve with
time as fixation becomes more rigid. Candidates for these
devices are generally younger and more active than those for
cemented application.
|
|
Total Hip Replacement - Stem Type with Hybrid
Fixation
Hybrid fixation is when one component is inserted without
cement, usually the socket, and one component is inserted with
cement, usually the stem. (Figures 4a and 4b)
Bearing Materials Used in Joint Replacement
Durability is dependent on the components used (materials,
type and preparation of the surfaces, as well as the design of
the components), technique and the quality of fixation,
activity level of the patient, and the biological tissue
reactivity which varies among individuals. The most commonly
used bearing combinations in joint replacement today are metal
or ceramic against ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.
These combinations have functioned well for most patients. The
durability is less in younger patients because of higher
activity levels. The fine particulate debris that is produced
causes tissue reaction. This process can undermine fixation
and result in loosening. While there is undoubtedly
variability in individual tissue reactivity to debris, there
is no known methodology to evaluate and determine in advance
which patients will react more severely. Since polyethylene
wear is proportional to the ball size of the femoral head, it
is recommended that the ball size should be reduced to 22 mm
(roughly one-half to one-third that of the normal hip) to
minimize wear for young and active individuals. However, the
use of the small ball can produce instability problems in some
individuals who have a greater amount of flexibility in their
joints especially if the components are not optimally positioned.
Because of the known deleterious effects of wear debris,
research has begun in an effort to minimize the wear of ultra
high molecular weight polyethylene. However, it will be many
years before we can determine the success of these
developments.
|
|
Metal-on-Metal Bearings
Metal/Metal (M/M) bearings were first used in the United States
when joint replacement began in the late 1960s. The component
design and fixation techniques were primitive by today's
standards. Further, the bearing manufacture was inconsistent and
these devices were discontinued in the 1970s. Now with modern
technology, bearing surfaces can be made optimally smooth and
round and thus the wear is minimized. Volumetric wear, compared
to polyethylene, can be reduced between 20 and 100 times
depending on ball size. It is also possible that the wear will
be reduced even further as research into this aspect
intensifies. M/M devices were reintroduced in Europe in 1988.
There are now U.S. manufacturers as well as European firms
manufacturing all-metal devices.
In addition to reduction in volumetric wear, the biological
tissue reaction locally, based on observation periods of up to
30 years, is less inflammatory, and therefore, less likely to
undermine the component's fixation. With metal/metal bearings,
unlike metal/polyethylene bearings, there is no penalty for
increasing the ball size. Therefore, it is possible to safely
improve the stability to minimize the risk of dislocation.
|
|
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings
All alumina-ceramic bearings have been utilized in Europe since
the early 1970s. A problem with the early ceramic materials was
its large grain structure which led to fractures. Manufacturing
of ceramics is now much improved with small grain size creating
a much stronger material. These bearings also produce low wear
similar to that of metal-on-metal bearings with substantial
reductions over plastic bearings. Because of concerns related to
the strength of the material, the shells must be made thicker in
order to minimize fracture and, therefore, surface replacements
are not feasible. The new generation components are much
improved for stem-type devices. The all-alumina bearings are
another option in the effort to minimize wear and tissue
reaction and to provide longer term durability. However, the
components must be optimally manufactured to minimize the risk
of fracture and inserted precisely to minimise wear.
|
|
Hemi-Surface Replacement for Osteonecrosis
One option to minimize wear debris and tissue reaction is to
eliminate the bearing by replacing only the diseased part of the
joint. A hemi-surface replacement is often recommended for
patients who have osteonecrosis of the femoral head (also
referred to as avascular necrosis) and have some remaining
articular cartilage on the acetabulum or pelvic side (Figure 5).
The hemi-surface replacement preserves and maintains bone by
providing physiological stress transfer to the femoral neck and
proximal femur. It avoids inflammatory reaction and loosening
due to polyethylene wear debris.
Fig 5 Beginning in 1981, custom hemi-surface devices were
inserted utilizing a titanium alloy which is a relatively soft
metal and scratches easily. These devices have been surprisingly
successful with many still functioning over 16 years even in
young patients whose average age was 32 years.
In 1996, newly designed components and instruments became
available and are now being used in many international centres
including in the United States, UK and India. Although the
durability depends on the quality of the cartilage at the time
of surgery, it is possible that even longer durability may be
achieved with the new, harder surface cobalt chrome components
which do not scratch easily. The technique is exacting and does
require precision fitting of the hemi-arthroplasty to the
articular cartilage of the pelvis. Patients who have had
fractures of the neck of the femur require a stemmed hemi-arthroplasty.
Surface hemi-arthroplasty has definite advantages over stem-type
hemi-arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis because of its
conservative nature. |
|
|
|
Back |
Ask for Detail
Package |
|